If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The TurKoTek Home Page can be accessed by clicking the link, or on the image on the top of the page on the left side. From there (or from the link here), you can access our Archived Salons and Selected Discussions. Our forums are easy to use, and you are welcome to read and post messages without registering. However, registration will enable a number of features that make the software more flexible and convenient for you, and you need not provide any information except your name (which is required even if you post without being registered) and a working email address. Please use your full name. We do not permit posting anonymously or under a pseudonym, ad hominem remarks, commercial promotion, comments bearing on the value of any item or on the reputation of any seller.
I agree that your little bag could have been made by an Armenian weaver. The colors alone (the probable insect-dyed brownish-red and indigo sulfonic acid dyed-green) suggest East Anatolian to me. This make sense when one considers the large Armenian population in eastern Anatolia prior to the outbreak of WW I.
Thanks for your thoughts. East Anatolian is an inriguing possibility. I think it's soumak of one kind or another - here is a snap of the bag turned inside out.
Yes, the picture of the inside clearly shows a soumak-like weave. Possibly a variant or hybrid because the thin purple band at the top looks more like ordinary kilim weave. There appear to be some variants of “weftless” soumak in which additional ground wefts are interspersed at intervals with weft wrapping, as well as some hybrid weaves combining weftless soumak and kilim. Weftless soumak is associated mainly, if not entirely, with Kurdish weavers. However, that is a broad generalization with likely exceptions. Although I still believe that the bag was likely made somewhere in eastern Anatolia (by Armenian or Kurdish hands) we need input from experts, and perhaps weavers, here.
After looking through several images of weftless soumak-woven pieces they appear to have a more "sculpted" surface compared to the present bag, the face of which looks more like reverse soumak. However, the weave structure visable on the inside of the bag has features that don't seem typical of reverse soumak.
The bottom third of your detail image shows floating weft, a technique that is very common in Baluch work. The upper two-thirds look like a soumak ground and use the weft insertion technique for some of the details. A very close look at the point ends where the yellow terminates into the red would be helpful. At this level of zoom it looks like soumak with compressed wraps and a reduction in weft count - but I can't tell.
The best I can come up with is that it is some sort of "compound weave" with elements of "reverse soumak" along with other weaving techniques. Not sure that better images will help.
One thing I can say for sure is that the iconography - the combination of apparent Christian and folk symbolism - is fascinating. I doubt if you will ever find another like it. It would be welcome in my collection anytime.
Welcome. I hope you find visiting Turkotek rewarding and I hope you will participate in the discussions.
Just a few niceties: you are welcome to post without registering, but we much prefer that you put your real name in the Username field when you do. If you register, that will happen automatically.
Tweet
Comment