Konya Yatak

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Joesph,

    I posted the example from the book to show similarities and also i wanted to make mention of the migration west which to this day still shows eastern weaving influences. Irregardless of the differences between the two pieces, there is a common DNA link between the two in my opinion.

    Heinz, you have a terrific eye for extraordinary pieces!
    Joe Lawrence

    Comment


    • #17
      I have since consulted the director of a well-known auction house about my Konya Yatak. I do not wish to mention his name here without his permission:

      „In my opinion, the Yatak is not an antique original, but a modern reproduction, produced with the intent to deceive. This is evidenced by the overly fine and regular knotting, the garish colors, the lack of patina, and the fabricated pattern. For several years now, forgeries made in Turkey have been smuggled into auctions and sold there as supposed originals.“

      I must confess that I myself was afraid it was a modern copy. I bought it from a Dutch auction house. Luckily, I didn't pay much for it. The lesson I learned was probably worth the money.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0689.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	350.5 KB
ID:	4200

      Comment


      • #18
        That's very interesting, and a little surprising! You may well have seen this rug, which has some similarities with yours, but it has a different tone and mood. It perhaps helps to illustrate what the director of the auction house was saying...


        Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-02-13 at 09.35.08.png
Views:	92
Size:	379.7 KB
ID:	4202

        Best wishes, John

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Joseph R. Putnak View Post
          I also think that Heinz's rug is significantly older that the circa 1925 date given to the other rug.

          Joseph
          Absolutely. Everything I can see says 1875 or earlier.

          Steve Price

          Comment


          • #20
            Hi everyone. I was also fooled by the yatak. But when I compare it with the example posted by John, I can see the differences in coloration and design.

            Joseph

            Comment


            • #21
              This director of the auction house should be jailed ! If your yatak is a forgery I have been wasting my time for the last 65 years dealing with oriental rugs.

              Comment


              • #22
                Greetings,

                Please register as a user on our site ratherthan continue posting as Guest which is intended to be tempoprary, pending registration. Guest posts still require a signature name.

                As noted above "We do not permit posting anonymously"

                Regards

                Comment


                • #23
                  I cannot fully buy the “made with the intent to deceive” comment. I have seen these and this piece doesn’t fit the normal counterfeit attempt to deceive. The counterfeit rug deception process normally involves many tricks to include using old period correct wool, soaking the piece in yogurt and letting it sit in the sun and creating “aged wear” damage on purpose. Your piece could have been made for 60 years ago and put away as a keep sake. It happens. Nonetheless, it’s still a wonderful and beautiful example.
                  Joe Lawrence

                  Comment

                  Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                  Auto-Saved
                  x
                  Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                  x
                  or Allowed Filetypes: jpg, jpeg, png, gif
                  x

                  Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image below.

                  Registration Image Refresh Image
                  Working...
                  X