If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The TurKoTek Home Page can be accessed by clicking the link, or on the image on the top of the page on the left side. From there (or from the link here), you can access our Archived Salons and Selected Discussions. Our forums are easy to use, and you are welcome to read and post messages without registering. However, registration will enable a number of features that make the software more flexible and convenient for you, and you need not provide any information except your name (which is required even if you post without being registered) and a working email address. Please use your full name. We do not permit posting anonymously or under a pseudonym, ad hominem remarks, commercial promotion, comments bearing on the value of any item or on the reputation of any seller.
Antique caucasian kuba prayer rug. Rare type. Kufic border. Inscribed and dated 1240=1825. All good natural colors. No chemical dyes. Rough condition with very low pile and slight damage as shown 4' x 4'5"
My Turkish friend reads the dating as Saban 1240.
Schaʿbān (arabic شعبان, DMG Šaʿbān) is the 8th month.
I think your two rugs from the Eastern Caucasus are really very attractive, particularly the yellow ground Kuba example from your previous post. Thank you for showing them. However, I tend to be a little cautious when it comes to accepting early date attributions for this group, partly due to the work of rug scholars such as Richard E. Wright who wrote extensively on the ‘Kustar’ craft industry program, which began in the late nineteenth century and produced new “Caucasian” rug designs and adapted existing ones for commercial purposes, and Ian Bennett through his book, Oriental Rugs: Volume 1 Caucasian. It seems that even most major auction house experts have become more conservative in their date attributions. I also question how much we can rely on inwoven dates, which seem to be relatively common in this group of rugs? Nevertheless, there is always room for other viewpoints and opinions. In this regard it is said that the late Harold Keshishian, when asked about the age of a rug, would sometimes reply, “I think this piece is older than we think it is.”
Comment