Welcome to TurkoTek's Discussion Forums

Archived Salons and Selected Discussions can be accessed by clicking on those words, or you can return to the Turkotek Home Page. Our forums are easy to use, and you are welcome to read and post messages without registering. However, registration will enable a number of features that make the software more flexible and convenient for you, and you need not provide any information except your name (which is required even if you post without being registered). Please use your full name. We do not permit posting anonymously or under a pseudonym, ad hominem remarks, commercial promotion, comments bearing on the value of any item currently on the market or on the reputation of any seller. Turkotek Discussion Forums - View Single Post - Painting in Houston MFA

View Single Post
Old April 6th, 2013, 04:23 PM   #3
Pierre Galafassi
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 87

Hi Chuck,

Indeed, a beautiful, very late example of «small Holbein» rug.

After the middle of the seventeenth century, Italian painters very seldom featured rugs in their paintings and when they did, they hardly bothered with details (Only a few Dutch «genre» and «interior» painters still used rugs at the time).

Bettera was an exception. He was perhaps a true ruggie since, as Filiberto mentions, most of his beautiful still-life-with-musical-instruments paintings feature a rug. In our shared databank, all but one illustrated rugs are from the «small Holbein» type, while the last one features imbricated lozenges, a design which origin is not clear to me (Anatolia?, western Persia?) (FIG 1).

FIG 1.

Indeed Chuck, the border of the Houston rug is interesting: A «double leaf-and-wineglass» border of the type discussed in Filiberto’s thread : http://www.turkotek.com/VB37/showthread.php?t=989.
Quite odd, since «small Holbein» rugs came, in nearly all cases, with a «kufik» border instead. One of the paintings in the data bank shared with Filiberto, shows the same border again, in details. (FIG 2). Which supports his opinion that Bettera used the same small pattern Holbein rug in his paintings.
FIG 2.

Your excellent close-up, Chuck, shows that the rug pile was severely down. Several of the other Bettera paintings also show this pile wearing. One can suppose that the rug(s) were in the family (or in the family of his rich friend and patron) since a long time and therefore were not necessarily examples of seventeenth century weaving.
Best regards
Pierre Galafassi is offline   Reply With Quote