Welcome to TurkoTek's Discussion Forums

Archived Salons and Selected Discussions can be accessed by clicking on those words, or you can return to the Turkotek Home Page. Our forums are easy to use, and you are welcome to read and post messages without registering. However, registration will enable a number of features that make the software more flexible and convenient for you, and you need not provide any information except your name (which is required even if you post without being registered). Please use your full name. We do not permit posting anonymously or under a pseudonym, ad hominem remarks, commercial promotion, comments bearing on the value of any item currently on the market or on the reputation of any seller. Turkotek Discussion Forums - Reply to Topic

Go Back   Turkotek Discussion Forums > Virtual Show and Tell > Your thoughts on chemche guls of a Tekke main

Virtual Show and Tell Just what the title says it is.

Thread: Your thoughts on chemche guls of a Tekke main Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Random Question

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
May 19th, 2019 07:11 PM
Andrew Leng Alex,
I had not really noticed the simplicity of the inner border. What caught my attention was the totally different main border with its combination of hexagons separated by bars with combs? and zig zags caught my attention. The origins of this sort of design are intriguing. They seem to apper on earlir rugs.
May 14th, 2019 03:48 AM
Alex Wolfson Hello Andrew,
That looks to be an example of pre-Russian period main carpet. Notice the absence of an inner guard border, which is a pretty reliable indicator of earlier pieces. Variations in the minor gul - both in size and shape - also seem also to appear more frequently on earlier Tekke (and Ersari group) rugs, becoming more standardised in the second half of the nineteenth century.
I hadn't noted before that this might occur more frequently in the second row, so this could be an interesting area for further research.
Congratulations on a good find!
May 6th, 2019 02:28 AM
David Katz
Chemche guls

Dear Andrew,

As you discovered in your research, design variations in secondary guls are not uncommon in Tekke weavings, though by no means ubiquitous. Here's an example from a main carpet in my collection; at least 3 different variations, and possible a fourth in the hemi-guls at the top edge of the central field.

Enjoy your beautiful carpet.

David Katz
April 29th, 2019 06:18 PM
Andrew Leng I was reading some of the Old Posts from 2008. There was lady called Sue Zimmerman who passed comments about wool, spinning and quality. I remember seeing her web pages in passing intending to cme back later. I can't find them on the net now I guess time has passed. anyone got any links?

Oh and this popped up because I once looked up something on academia

There are a whole lot more articles on rugs highlighted listed on it.
April 26th, 2019 07:30 PM
Andrew Leng Hi Patrick
I'm afraid to me it doesn't seem right to call these pink knots replacement knots.
The fact that there's the odd row or knot here are there seems odd.
Back in the day of the pink wool there was the odd knot missing so someone replace them. Ok but why have there been no more knots disappeared since then? There's no: odd random patches, holes or missing knots very obvious.

“These smaller Turkmen pieces are a handy size to use as furnishing pieces - or wall art - than the much larger main carpets. “ This is a turkoman main.
April 24th, 2019 09:20 PM
Patrick Weiler Andrew,
From the back it is easy to spot the replacement red, which has faded to pink on the front and from the back is a more reddish color than the surrounding original knots. The front photo shows also what appears to be a few purple/lavender knots in the middle of the replacement red. From the back these knots seem to be thinner and a bit lighter than the original blue below the repair. These smaller Turkmen pieces are a handy size to use as furnishing pieces - or wall art - than the much larger main carpets.
Patrick Weiler
April 22nd, 2019 09:20 PM
Andrew Leng Hope from these two pictures you can see the individual knots on the back, The two different hanks of wool were obviously used during the manufacture..

The pink looks softer and hasn't worn as much as the orange colour.

The pink colour does not change down the knot, They do however look a bit more matching on the back?
In other places they match better on the back.

April 21st, 2019 03:00 AM
Rich Larkin Hi Andrew,

It looks as though a repairer used wool dyed with poor quality dyes for the repair. The surface faded to pink, gray, etc. It is not an uncommon phenomenon with rugs repaired years ago, probably in the Middle East.

Those pink sections are interesting, as the yarn is nearly a perfect match on the back, where light exposure has been minimal. Try spreading the pile on the surface side of the pink to see if the wool is a different color at the base of the knots. You may find the repair knots are symmetrical, whereas the original rug uses asymmetrical knots.

April 20th, 2019 08:12 PM
Andrew Leng Hi Chuck.
That's a nice little rug I do like the elam ends.

Hi Rich,
Yes I do like the variation in these old rugs. Moving it into the spring sunshine today to get clearer pictures reminds me why you love it so much. ( The dark northern winter's house lights even with the best lighting do not let it exhibit its full beauty).
The subtle variation in shade of the background colours across the rug is beautiful and gentle. not that much overworked word abrash which now seems to mean something out of a digital print system where alternating rows and knots have to hit you in the eye with different shades.

The design variation in this rug also seem closer to a tradition but I must admit I admire some of the beautiful smart ones.

One good thing about discussing details here. It makes me go back and look at the rug to see where I can take a photograph best showing a good example. In doing so this time I realise it might have been a tape that has been applied and then removed leaving a coating of adhesive behind.. There is a broad strip right round the edge and then broad strips about every 9 inches across the carpet. I can live with it.

The other issue I have is that pinkie patch.

It jumps out at you being thicker than the rest of the rug. When I first saw it on the floor of the auction I thought little touch of dye to hide that because it drags your eye to it. At first sight I thought it was a piece cut-out of another rug and stuck in. On closer inspection it seems to have been carefully woven in to pattern but surely not with such an unsympathetic colour originally.

This leads onto looking at the similar is pink knots, scattered here and there, all over the rug. Have these faded out or someone pulled from a different hank of wool. They do not show so obviously on the back. (remember the octagons are turned over so the white dot at 2 am top right slope on the back is 11 o’clock top left slope.

April 18th, 2019 01:56 AM
Rich Larkin Hi Andrew,

Of course, the variation in the minor guls is all to the good; you agree, yes? The more I study your rug, the better I like it. And, as to the glue, at least it only appears in a few spots, right?

I once bought a small (2' X 3') Hamadan mat that was mid-20th century department store material, but old enough to have good colors, that had a thick coating of some sort of glue, or rubbery compound, slathered all over the back. I suspect it was originally intended to be a non-slip treatment; but age and long service on the floor had changed the coating to a hard, smooth business that encouraged slippage rather than minimized it, and would have stopped a bullet in the bargain. I bought it for the express purpose of experimenting with methods to remove the coating. I tried everything I could think of, and never touched it.

April 18th, 2019 01:11 AM
Chuck Wagner Hi Andrew,

Here is a small (4x7 ft or so) Tekke rug we have that displays similar variability in the minor (and major) guls.

I think it is late 19th century. There is no noticable green on this one and ample but artful use of cochineal, a point that Pat raised. I was drawn to it by the use of different motifs in the elem ends.

The border motifs and colors on yours point to an earlier age, mid 19th century and possibly earlier.

You can see that the aspect ratio of the major guls varies along the length of this rug, and if you start counting the little diamond motifs in the minor guls you will see where the differences in size and execution show up; a few of the minor guls are substantialy larger than the rest.

April 17th, 2019 09:15 PM
Andrew Leng Patrick and Rich

My thoughts too were that the rug with a communal effort by different individuals for some domestic purpose and not produced to a control standard. Which one might do if you had an eye to trade or show.

I'm still intrigued why a specific row of minor guls is different in so many versions.

I have not studied the main border patterns being a bit dazzled by its complexity. The variety of patterns must have cultural significance. It's not quite so easy to compare these on different internet images.
April 17th, 2019 02:33 PM
I give up.

Hi Patrick,

"One would assume that the weavers realized that there were differences in the size of the motifs and did this on purpose...."

Or, different weavers were taking their turns from time to time....?

April 17th, 2019 04:46 AM
Patrick Weiler
Changing Chemches

I like your piece. Perhaps the green and lack of cochineal would put it a generation earlier than my Tekke rug. Here is a picture of part of it. The upper minor gol is bigger than the one below it, though the designs are the same - unlike differing designs in yours. The upper version has a knot more than the lower version in small areas such as the central horizontal projections. But there is also compression due to either thinner wool (more knots per inch) or more pressure on the knots when they were hammered down during the manufacture. This rug has substantially different sizes of the guls in some areas, but not necessarily all the way across the rug in any given horizontal stretch. One would assume that the weavers realized that there were differences in the size of the motifs and did this on purpose - though what that purpose was is unknown.

Patrick Weiler
April 16th, 2019 08:47 AM
Andrew Leng Rich
Yes it's quite a good job. To my shame i missed it in the auction.
In my defence the table had cabriole legs and it was difficult to crawl around under and no chance of moving it out and a full turn over. . I was distracted by that horrid pink patch on upper left and valuing the ghastly glue back and bits of ware. It looked nice, much older than i had ever seen before so I thought I would have low bid and research it. - before I found turkotek.
April 16th, 2019 03:57 AM
Rich Larkin Hi Andrew,

Is the seam of this vertical cut obvious? It looks like a slick job from here.

April 15th, 2019 08:36 PM
Andrew Leng Chuck,
I have been and stroked my rug.

Apparently I have photographed it upside down. the blue-green section is at the top of the rug, woven last.
The first four main guls woven, first are at the top of the picture and have both quadrants dark blue
This would indicate that after the rug was started somebody came along with a nice blue green wool which they decided to incorporate into the design.

This seems to add to the charm / interesting history of this rug. To me anyway.

I do not see it as a commercial product.
April 15th, 2019 08:24 PM
Andrew Leng Rich yes will do.

On the overview picture look at the bottom row of main guls..

The right-hand end has two blue-green quadrants (top right bottom left).

The next row on the left has top right dark blue bottom left blue green. it is obvious from the rug this has been cut- through two adjacent? main guls of different colour and a bit removed.

The next row on the left have dark blue top right bottom and left quadrants.

The left-hand row have blue green top right blue green bottom left quadrants
April 15th, 2019 03:20 PM
Rich Larkin Hi Andrew,

I don't have much time at the moment, but my general comment about this rug is that it is much better than you seem to fear. It is not a late, degraded version of the Tekke tradition. Good one by you to have nipped it out of that auction.

I do not quite get where the 'cut and shut' treatment occurred. Can you elaborate?

April 15th, 2019 09:17 AM
Andrew Leng Hi Chuck
Good logic it shows I'm not a practical weaver or very observant.

I might skip the knot counts bit I always find that a bit difficult.

This thread has more than 20 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.