Posted by Michael Wendorf on March 22, 1999 at 15:20:07:
Rarity has been mentioned in the introduction as a desired attribute with most collectors. Is this so?
It seems to me that good condition Kazaks, to pick one type, are relatively rare but also common enough to make them rather available to collectors and to dealers wishing to sell them to collectors. The fact that they are available and of a known type may help to explain the realtively high prices good ones seem to make even though the evidence tends to show that they were workshop pieces and not tribal or otherwise very ethnographic. The question then is does rarity confer value? I think that may depend on how rare the thing really is. I've seen some very beautiful things not do much because they were not understood and did not seem to fit into what collectors expect and were difficult to value without the experience of past sales or the existence of an identical piece in a certain collection. A decent Fachralo Kazak or Eagle or Sewan or (need I go on?) seems to do better than lesser established types if only because collectors see them in books, at auction and seem to feel this is what so and so has, I'd better have one too. In this way rarity beyond scarce seems to confer no value at all.
Any thoughts on rarity? Regards, Michael
Post a Followup