Posted by Yon Bard on February 17, 1999 at 20:24:21:
I think the date on #3 could just as easily be 1292 or 1312 (probably not 1392!). There is always an element of doubt in interpreting what amounts to illiterate scrbblings. The solar-year hypothesis seems suspicious to me. Is there any reason to think that anybody in that environment would put one on a weaving?
Post a Followup