Re: Is it a genius?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Salon ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Tom Cole on February 10, 1999 at 07:59:54:

In Reply to: Re: Is it a genius? posted by Wendel Swan on February 08, 1999 at 10:31:16:

: I am normally at least as skeptical of the existence of animate objects in many rugs as Jerry is about this one. However, I think that this rug does have an intentional duality of image that is certainly rare, but not unknown.

: My guess would be that the rug before us was woven without the aid of a cartoon. The borders seem well executed, so one cannot help but feel that whatever the weaver put into the field was intended. Strictly as a prayer rug, the proportions are not what one would expect, indicating a compromise in order to also create the face. As to the face, the zig-zag line outlining the mihrab is at least generally consistent with the way eyebrows are depicted prominently in Persian rugs. Further, the "stern" expression on the mouth resembles what one might find in urban pictorial carpets with greater definition.

: There is a group of Northwest Persian pictorial rugs with a central animal (normally a camel) which is comprised of many other animals - serpents, felines, monkeys, etc. They are gnerally executed from a cartoon, so imagination is not required to see these animals quite clearly.

: I once saw an Afshar bag face with what at first appeared to be a strange center medallion. Finally, I realized that it was a mosque reflected upon itself.

: There is an interesting Sil-I-Soltan published in Oriental Carpets by Robert de Calatchi as plate 69, which expresses duality as botehs with human faces. I'll try to scan the image and provide it to Larry for posting.

: To my knowledge, this concept of duality in representational images is limited to Persianate rugs. I cannot recall seeing such a feature in any rug that we might call Turkic.

: Daniel has posted a very interesting rug. Perhaps others could expound on the philosophical and religious connotations.

: Wendel

Wendel- Duality (or even plurality) in representational art is not uncommon. Check out some ancient Bactrian seals and it is quite evident. Did you see the "Tibetan" rug I had in Denver with a 'lion' enclosed in a flaming roundel? It too could be read in more than one way, with the haunches of the animal appearing to be an elephant's head. Bactrian seals do the same thing, artfully depicting more than one image within a single element. Regarding this rug, I am not sure of what to think about the 'genius' of it. I don't particularly like the rug and would have been hard pressed to persevere and study it to the point of "realizing the genius" of it. Doesn't appeal to me.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Salon ] [ FAQ ]