Answers - personal to John's questions

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Salon ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by mARVIN aMSTEY on December 14, 1998 at 20:43:53:

Here goes:
Pic 1: ugly; looks cut and patched
Pic 2: beautiful, but I'm biased
Pic 3: ugly, poor border detail, hurried, inaccurate with irregular, displeasing color combinations in the field
Pic 5: detail of minor gul not clear enough to comment.
Pic 7: demonstrates poor weaving ability and the crooked diagonals detract from the design
Pic 8: too worn to see minor gul clearly
Pic 9: same as 3. She's working at her limit or she's drunk
Pic 10 and 11: neither is superior; they are different and equally attractive.
Those are my preferences; anybody want to fight about it?! I look forward to seeing comments that differ. Marvin

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Salon ] [ FAQ ]