Welcome to TurkoTek's Discussion Forums

Archived Salons and Selected Discussions can be accessed by clicking on those words, or you can return to the Turkotek Home Page. Our forums are easy to use, and you are welcome to read and post messages without registering. However, registration will enable a number of features that make the software more flexible and convenient for you, and you need not provide any information except your name (which is required even if you post without being registered). Please use your full name. We do not permit posting anonymously or under a pseudonym, ad hominem remarks, commercial promotion, comments bearing on the value of any item currently on the market or on the reputation of any seller. Turkotek Discussion Forums - View Single Post - Another Tibetan fragment

View Single Post
Old March 25th, 2011, 04:12 PM   #10
Filiberto Boncompagni
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 71
Default

An observation on the first two fragments – the one posted by me and the one posted by Pierre – is that they present elements of design that were woven with more restrictive techniques, like the borders of "S" of the first piece whose “forms are perfectly balanced warp-substitution designs”. See Marla Mallett’s “Tracking the Archetype”
http://www.marlamallett.com/archetyp.htm

The border is also the same of the “Phoenix and Dragon” rug, by the way (we’ll have to keep in mind that).
Both fragments have stepped diagonals, another legacy from flatweaves.

The Christie’s fragment doesn’t have these “legacies” though. What do you think?

Regards,

Filiberto
Filiberto Boncompagni is offline   Reply With Quote