Welcome to TurkoTek's Discussion Forums

Archived Salons and Selected Discussions can be accessed by clicking on those words, or you can return to the Turkotek Home Page. Our forums are easy to use, and you are welcome to read and post messages without registering. However, registration will enable a number of features that make the software more flexible and convenient for you, and you need not provide any information except your name (which is required even if you post without being registered). Please use your full name. We do not permit posting anonymously or under a pseudonym, ad hominem remarks, commercial promotion, comments bearing on the value of any item currently on the market or on the reputation of any seller. Turkotek Discussion Forums - View Single Post - The tile hypothesis

View Single Post
Old March 15th, 2011, 10:38 PM   #8
Yohann Gissinger
Members
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: France
Posts: 10
Default

Hello Pierre and Filiberto,

Pierre, the pedestal of your last picture makes me think about this one:


St. Louis of Toulouse Crowning Robert of Anjou 1317

I have a doubt about the opportunity to put such a pedestal on a rug or a textile in the real life, even in the XIVth c. when it was so rare and so expensive, tiles are more durable.

There's another hypothesis besides the tiles one: It's also possible that certain floor decorations in paintings are imaginary and in tight relation with the scene, only created for its symbolic system value.

Please, have another look at the "Lippo Memmi, Maria lactans,1340s, Staatliche Museen, Berlin" for example. Is there anything else than symbols in this scene?
Here an interesting bestiary in english for you: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/bestiary/bestiary.hti( in Maria lactans birds could be herons).

Amicalement,
Y

Last edited by Yohann Gissinger; March 15th, 2011 at 10:53 PM.
Yohann Gissinger is offline   Reply With Quote