Turkotek Discussion Forums

Turkotek Discussion Forums (http://www.turkotek.com/VB37/index.php)
-   Miscellaneous (rug-related) Topics (http://www.turkotek.com/VB37/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Fragments of the Ardabil Carpet (http://www.turkotek.com/VB37/showthread.php?t=3588)

Charon Lefleur May 19th, 2016 08:20 PM

Fragments of the Ardabil Carpet
 
I know that the largest piece of the Ardabil Carpet is in England and a smaller piece is in California but I read that there are smaller fragments floating about. Does anyone know if these smaller fragments have ever been discovered? Are they in museums or private collections?

Chuck Wagner May 20th, 2016 02:34 PM

Hi

There are two Ardabil carpets, they are a pair, intact and not fragments. One is in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London and one in the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

There are some images in an archived discussion here: http://www.turkotek.com/salon_00117/...?s=&forumid=75

The official V&A web page is here: https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/the-ardabil-carpet

Regards
Chuck WAgner

Charon Lefleur May 20th, 2016 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck Wagner (Post 20570)
Hi

There are two Ardabil carpets, they are a pair, intact and not fragments. One is in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London and one in the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

There are some images in an archived discussion here: http://www.turkotek.com/salon_00117/...?s=&forumid=75

The official V&A web page is here: https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/the-ardabil-carpet

Regards
Chuck WAgner

Thanks, Chuck! I had read somewhere (though I'm having trouble finding the article now) that there were fragments of the same carpet in circulation. Is that just a myth? Thanks again for your quick response!

Joel Greifinger May 20th, 2016 11:01 PM

Fragments
 
Quote:

I had read somewhere (though I'm having trouble finding the article now) that there were fragments of the same carpet in circulation.
The Museum of Fine Arts in Boston appears to own one:

http://www.mfa.org/collections/objec...l-carpet-73454

Joel Greifinger

Lloyd Kannenberg May 21st, 2016 03:59 AM

The Getty Museum published a booklet, The Ardabil Carpets (Malibu 1974) by Rexford Stead, that answers some questions about these magnificent artifacts. The Getty Ardabil was cannibalized to complete the V&A example, but there are probably fragments still “out there”. According to Mr. Stead, about 1972 one such was offered to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art by Mr. Eric Binns of Surrey; it was an inheritance from his father, who obtained it in Tabriz (no date given). I’m pretty sure copies of the booklet, if not the Ardabils themselves, are still available at a reasonable price.

Lloyd Kannenberg

Chuck Wagner May 21st, 2016 04:09 AM

Hi LLoyd,

Actually, it's available online: http://www.getty.edu/publications/vi...892360151.html

Cheers :cheers:,
Chuck Wagner

Charon Lefleur May 23rd, 2016 06:57 PM

Thank you so much, all of you! Reading the online pamphlet now. Very much appreciated!

Patrick Weiler May 27th, 2016 03:21 AM

Been there, done that
 
Way back in 2001 I was in London and took a time out from the schedule to walk about a mile over to the V&A to see the Ardabil there. It was an impressive sight, being so large. About 25 years ago I visited LACMA and asked about their Ardabil, though the museum workers seemed not to know that it was in their collection. Finally, a couple of years ago they were displaying it, so I got a chance to see that one in person
also. It seems that "Other fragments have appeared on the market from time to time. The knot density is actually higher on the Los Angeles carpet."
I haven't heard of any fragments on the market, but I am sure that when they do appear, they are probably quite expensive.
Patrick Weiler

alainb March 6th, 2018 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charon Lefleur (Post 20561)
I know that the largest piece of the Ardabil Carpet is in England and a smaller piece is in California but I read that there are smaller fragments floating about. Does anyone know if these smaller fragments have ever been discovered? Are they in museums or private collections?

I own one small fragment

Martin Andersen March 11th, 2018 08:51 AM

Fascinating story with the two Ardabil carpets, I have always had the felling they may have cannibalized the wrong one of the pair (of course the cannibalism in itself was wrong, but it was done in a time different from ours).
Davids Collection in Copenhagen have a fragment http://www.davidmus.dk/en/collection...ds/art/25-2008
Best Martin

Martin Andersen March 11th, 2018 09:17 AM

(and would of course be terrible terrible curious to see a photo of your fragment Alainb :))

Unregistered March 11th, 2018 04:00 PM

I don't know how to send the image.
In 1966 I was in London for the first time. I met Mr. Galindos who was a far relative. He was very old. He told me that in his youth he was na active carpet dealer. One of his employees was an old armenian who participated to the restauration of the Arbabil carpet. He gave me the small fragment. Very fine on silk fondation.

alainb March 11th, 2018 10:27 PM

small fragment Arbebil carpet
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin Andersen (Post 24134)
(and would of course be terrible terrible curious to see a photo of your fragment Alainb :))

I repeat the message I sent this morning.
I don't know how to send the images through this fórum.
The first time I went to London in 1966 I met a far relative named Mr. Galindos. He was very old. He told me that when he was na active carpet dealer in his youth one of his emplyees was na old armenian man who participated to the restauration of the Ardabil carpet. He gave me the small fragmente.
It is very fine on silk fondation

Regards

Steve Price March 11th, 2018 10:35 PM

Hi

If you send the image files to me (sprice@vcu.edu) attached to e-mail, I'll take care of them and send you instructions on how to post them. While you're doing that, please include your full name so I can change your user name to your full name. We don't permit pseudonyms in posts.

Steve Price

Alain Bueno March 12th, 2018 11:38 AM

Ardebil fragment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin Andersen (Post 24134)
(and would of course be terrible terrible curious to see a photo of your fragment Alainb :))

These are the images of my small Ardebil fragment :

http://www.turkotek.com/show_and_tell/alain_1.jpg

http://www.turkotek.com/show_and_tell/alain_2.jpg

Ken Shum March 12th, 2018 08:39 PM

I believe the carpet in LACMA was finer of the two, so these other fragments you mentioned could not have come from either carpet. Unless, the one or both were repaired with patches from a third carpet sometime before the current two were merged early in the 20th Century. :felix:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick Weiler (Post 20612)
Way back in 2001 I was in London and took a time out from the schedule to walk about a mile over to the V&A to see the Ardabil there. It was an impressive sight, being so large. About 25 years ago I visited LACMA and asked about their Ardabil, though the museum workers seemed not to know that it was in their collection. Finally, a couple of years ago they were displaying it, so I got a chance to see that one in person
also. It seems that "Other fragments have appeared on the market from time to time. The knot density is actually higher on the Los Angeles carpet."
I haven't heard of any fragments on the market, but I am sure that when they do appear, they are probably quite expensive.
Patrick Weiler


Martin Andersen March 13th, 2018 03:48 PM

Here what Rexford Stead writes about the cannibalization of the Los Angeles carpet, done prior to the V&A acquirement of their carpet:

Aside from removal of the outer borders and a section of lower field on the Los Angeles Ardabil, which has diminished its overall size….
….Writings on the Los Angeles carpet often mention that the borders were sacrificed, presumably about 1890 or 1891, to accommodate repairs on the great "intact" version that hangs proudly in the Victoria and Albert. The first edition of the Handbook of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art mentions only the loss of the outer borders, and this derives from a statement in the museum filesfrom a Mr. E. Fowles at Duveen Brothers. Would that just this were true.
A comparison of the pair confirms that the Los Angeles carpet suffered more grievously (fig. 15). Not only were all borders beyond the inner cloud-band guard border removed, but also a substantial section of the lower field, accounting for the imbalance of the central medallion and its appendages within the field, and the absence of radiating ogees within the corners at the truncated end. Given such mutilation, it is perhaps little wonder that more than a decade went its way before existence of the Los Angeles pendant was revealed.
The missing Los Angeles borders are known to us only through the London-carpet.


And thanks Alain Bueno, what a beautiful little fragment :) Almost kind of like a reliquia.

Best
Martin

Martin Andersen March 13th, 2018 03:59 PM

And Alain, I suppose you know but a simple knot count could determine if your fragment is from the Los Angeles or the V&A carpet :)

380-420 per square inch - Los Angeles
297-324 per square inch - V&A

best Martin

Alain Bueno March 14th, 2018 11:41 AM

Ardebil fragment
 
Thank you for your information

Best regards


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.