Welcome to TurkoTek's Discussion Forums

Archived Salons and Selected Discussions can be accessed by clicking on those words, or you can return to the Turkotek Home Page. Our forums are easy to use, and you are welcome to read and post messages without registering. However, registration will enable a number of features that make the software more flexible and convenient for you, and you need not provide any information except your name (which is required even if you post without being registered). Please use your full name. We do not permit posting anonymously or under a pseudonym, ad hominem remarks, commercial promotion, comments bearing on the value of any item currently on the market or on the reputation of any seller. Turkotek Discussion Forums - Reply to Topic


Go Back   Turkotek Discussion Forums > Miscellaneous (rug-related) Topics > Interesting article for discussion...

Miscellaneous (rug-related) Topics Opinions on books, articles, recent auctions, exhibitions, etc.

Thread: Interesting article for discussion... Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Random Question
Title:
  
Message:

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
May 30th, 2016 01:35 AM
Patrick Weiler A similar damaging impact on Iranian nomadic and village weaving also happened back in the 1920's when nomads were being forcibly settled, in the oil boom era in Iran after the oil embargo of the early 70's ended - bringing nomads to the oil industry - and during the economic sanctions embargo of the 1990's as well as the recent economic embargo. Rug manufacturing in China, Pakistan and India took up most of the slack/demand as Iranian weavers could only produce enough rugs for internal consumption and countries not part of the embargoes. The concern in the article, though, is not about formal, "city" rugs, but the "tribal" rugs made with "natural" dyes, a kind of artisan product rather than the more commercial, commodity, factory handmade rugs that are the majority of the handmade rugs on the market. These so-called tribal rugs are mostly what is known as a cottage industry, with weavers mainly being provided the dyed wool to weave at home or workshops to specifications provided by the atelier. These include the Gabbeh Iranian rugs, Nepalese rugs woven by Tibetan refugees, Turkish village rugs and Afghan refugees in Pakistan. Very few rugs are woven by actual nomads for internal use, because for their floor they buy the cheapest substitute - not to mention that nomadic life is much restricted today. For personal use, these Iranian nomads mostly made flatweave kilims to cover their belongings in the back of the tent and on the floor, with some making a pile rug for formal occasions. This is pictured in many photos of 40-50 years ago and longer. Here is a Qashqai tent with flatweaves at the back and a felt rug on the ground.

The cost of making "tribal rugs" is much higher than Chinese, Pakistani, Nepal etc rugs. The wages they can make are higher for other work, so it is not worth their time to make rugs any more.
Which leaves us collectors with older rugs, many of which were also factory or cottage made. Most collectors don't even buy the new "tribal" rugs. They are more interior decorator pieces. On a bus tour of Turkey during the Istanbul ICOC one of our group bought a brand new "Caucasian" carpet that was scheduled to undergo their artificial aging process.
The recession and the internet upended the traditional marketplace for antique rugs and the high prices of yesteryear crashed - except for exceptional pieces which only the well-heeled can afford.
Patrick Weiler
May 27th, 2016 02:37 PM
Marvin Amstey I'm familiar with the Zollanvari products: much copying of South Persian antique rugs and much modification of the same old tribal rug designs. Their use of natural dyes and hand spun wool, however, make a superior product, but not cheap.
May 27th, 2016 12:44 PM
Steve Price Hi Paul

They stopped weaving antique rugs and carpets more than 100 years ago.



Steve Price
May 27th, 2016 04:46 AM
Paul Smith
Interesting article for discussion...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/wo...orld.html?_r=0

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.